Auto saved by Logseq

This commit is contained in:
Matthias Eckert 2023-03-06 16:13:30 +01:00
parent 556ef0124a
commit 6365a08806

View File

@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
- What about the missing event ID 119434986? Is that a bug or can events have missing IDs in the increasing series?
- Not a bug. As stated above it is due to the kafka stream.
- What is createdAt referring to? (I assumed its the time the event happened, but then later IDs should have higher timestamps) Why can it be decreasing in events with later IDs. How does it relate to the document timestamps (we established in earlier conversations that document updatedAt can differ from event createdAt because they are different processes)
- Ich glaub bei dem Beispiel das er anführt hatten wir die Probleme mit Kubernetes im RZ und da ist dann beim Neustarten der Event Verarbeitung auch der Offset wieder auf einem alten Wert gelandet.
- Ich glaub bei dem Beispiel das er anführt hatten wir die Probleme mit Kubernetes im RZ und da ist dann beim Neustarten der Event Verarbeitung auch der Offset wieder auf einem alten Wert gelandet. Beim Check der letzten 24310 Events (```
139470000
``` -> )
- How am I supposed to know if I got all events if there are missing ones and timestamps and/or IDs are not monotonically increasing?
- Also if you replay events, do you also replay data, so is e.g. document 7a233a97-1f18-3792-b287-c7b35f601f0b also not yet updated on the documents endpoint and we need to wait 15 minutes from some timestamp (in that case no idea how to figure that out instead of retrying for some time) for this to update?